district court of ravnkær case no. 2026-r-0041 the state v. jens møller

order to unseal exhibit p-14: life insurance policy and related records

the court, having reviewed the prosecution’s application to unseal documents relating to life insurance policy no. lf-2014-88231 held by alm. brand livsforsikring, and finding that these records are material to the question of motive and that the interests of justice outweigh any remaining privacy concerns of the deceased’s estate, hereby orders the following documents released into the public record of these proceedings.

exhibit p-14a: policy summary

field detail
insurer alm. brand livsforsikring
policy no. lf-2014-88231
insured erik bredahl
beneficiary jens møller (designated as business partner)
death benefit 2,400,000 dkk
premium payor bredahl & møller agricultural supply
effective date march 15, 2014
last premium paid january 2, 2026

the policy contains a standard beneficiary-change clause (§ 4.2), permitting the insured to redesignate the beneficiary at any time by written notice to the insurer. no such notice was received by alm. brand prior to the insured’s death.

exhibit p-14b: customer service call record

on january 8, 2026 — six days prior to the death of erik bredahl — the insured placed a telephone call to alm. brand’s customer service line at 14:22. the call lasted approximately seven minutes and was routed to the policy changes department.

the insurer’s internal log notes the call was handled by a representative identified only by employee number ab-1147. no policy modification was processed as a result of the call. the nature of the inquiry was not recorded in the system notes.

the representative (employee ab-1147) is currently on maternity leave and has not been available for interview. the prosecution has indicated it may seek to compel testimony at a later stage if the representative becomes available.

note from the court

the parties are reminded that the contents of these documents are now part of the public record. both prosecution and defense may reference them freely in examination of witnesses and in argument.

the court makes no finding at this time regarding the interpretation of the january 8 telephone call. the fact that a call was placed to the policy changes department does not, standing alone, establish the purpose of that call. the parties may draw their own inferences and present them to the court.

so ordered.

judge h. mortensen district court of ravnkær february 3, 2026